[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: require "rubygems"



Cédric,

* Cédric Boutillier <cedric.boutillier@gmail.com> [130918 22:14]:
> Given that we are in the process of dropping ruby1.8 and given that
> ruby1.9.1 and ruby2.0 load rubygems by default ¹, I was wondering if it
> was still necessary to patch out source packages to remove the 'require
> "rubygems"' statements (since they are no-ops with those recent versions
> of the interpreter), at least when ruby1.8 will have disappeared from
> the archive.
> 
> What do you think?

I think patching out 'require "rubygems"' has now become
unnecessary, and in the name of not carrying useless patches, should
go.

C.

-- 
       Christian Hofstaedtler       | design, deploy, scale
http://christian.hofstaedtler.name/ | phone +43 720 699846

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: