Re: New upstream for ruby-cassiopee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/2013 12:39 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:11:34AM +0530, Nitesh A Jain wrote:
>> I have updated the package to the new upstream and have pushed it to
the repo
>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-cassiopee.git
>
>
>> Please review it and consider uploading it
>
> Hi Nitesh,
>
> Thanks for your work. Here are a few comments:
>
> in debian/changelog, you still have UNRELEASED instead of unstable for
> the targeted suite. Changes between debian/0.1.0-1 and upstream/0.1.10
> have not been documented in the changelog.
>
> Possible improvements:
> change copyright file to have a single License standalone paragraph
> extend the man page to include all options of bin/cassie
> install bin/demo* as examples
> remove README from installed docs, regarding the amount of information
> it contains.
>
> It can be questionable if the 0.1.10 version is worth an upload, since
> the only change (except metadata) is:
>
> --- a/lib/cassiopee.rb
> +++ b/lib/cassiopee.rb
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ require 'digest/md5'
> require 'logger'
> require 'zlib'
> require 'text'
> -require 'text/util'
Hi,
in fact ruby-cassiopee 0.1.10 requires ruby-text 1.2.1.
The code update in cassiopee is only to reflect changes in dependency
ruby-text.
If you wish to upgrade ruby-cassiopee, please update ruby-text first.
Olivier
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cédric
- --
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=A6iM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: