Re: [DRE-maint] rails pkg

[Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>]

If we provide just one version then it doesn't really make sense to provide virtual packages, we can have real packages instead.

O.

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Praveen A <pravi.a@gmail.com> wrote:

2013/5/24 Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>:

> Hi,
>
> what's your opinion on rails(-defaults) pkg?
>
> Should we bump it to 3.2 or just remove it and keep only rails3?
>
> (And what to do when rails-4.0 is out?)

How about providing ruby-{action,active}* virtual packages? Some of
them already have but some of them don't have (ruby-activemodel). Even
those who have, some of them are only in experimental
(ruby-activeresource).

--
പ്രവീണ്‍ അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്‍
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your
rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as
they follow the rules: laws and constitution.

--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>