[Resending the email to the list, spelling correctly the address] Hi James, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:08:26PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > It's not clear to me from the email what I'm supposed to do in this > case. > Vim Build-Depends on ruby1.8(-dev) in order to enable the ruby bindings. > This results in binary packages that Depend on libruby1.8. I used to > B-D on the unversioned packages, but I was told a year ago from someone > on the Ruby team that I should be using the versioned packages. > So, is Vim a false positive on this list or is there actually something > that needs to change here? Indeed, having a closer look at vim's packaging, I believe that vim is indeed a false positive, and that nothing related to Ruby needs to be changed. Please accept our apologies for the noise. Best wishes, Cédric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature