Re: RFS: ruby-net-irc
At Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:52:22 -0600,
Gunnar Wolf <email@example.com> wrote:
> > In current renaming practice, transitonal package of libnet-irc-ruby and
> > ruby-net-irc are same package name. How do I treat it?
> IMO, as this is a completely unrelated piece of software (completely
> unrelated to libnet-irc-ruby), it should neither provide it or
> conflict with it (unless, of course, there is a namespace clash).
I see. I'll add "Conflict: libnet-irc-ruby".
> I say you should, paralelly and independently, just upload
> ruby-net-irc, and file a bug on ftp.debian.org requesting the removal
> of libnet-irc-ruby. Maybe add a README.Debian explaining they are two
> unrelated libraries, and that the new one does not provide the old
> one's API nor anything similar.
Ok. I try them. Many thanks for your suggestion, and sorry for late
Youhei SASAKI <firstname.lastname@example.org>
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07