Re: RFS: ruby-sdl
Hi,
At Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:02:24 +0100,
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas.nussbaum@loria.fr> wrote:
>
> On 21/01/12 at 03:26 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> > There are 2 problems...
> >
> > - Currently, the old (transitional) packages and new package has same
> > version number. How do we treat it?
>
> Version it 2.1.1.1-2, so that everything works fine for binary packages.
Thanks. I set version number to 2.1.1.1-2
> > - The upstream author release *same* source with different version
> > number. One is 2.1.1.1 at rubyforge.org, the other is 2.1.1 at
> > rubygems.org.
>
> Let's use 2.1.1.1 so that it's greater than the previous version in
> Debian
Ok. If bump up upstream gem's version number, we should change debian/watch.
> There seems to be something broken with the git repo. The master branch
> diverges from the upstream branch, and pristine-tar fails to generate
> the orig.tar.gz file.
I'm very sorry, I forgot push tags "upstream/2.1.1.1". I commit it.
Best Wishes,
---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
<uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
Reply to: