Re: RFS: ruby-sdl
At Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:02:24 +0100,
Lucas Nussbaum <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 21/01/12 at 03:26 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> > There are 2 problems...
> > - Currently, the old (transitional) packages and new package has same
> > version number. How do we treat it?
> Version it 22.214.171.124-2, so that everything works fine for binary packages.
Thanks. I set version number to 126.96.36.199-2
> > - The upstream author release *same* source with different version
> > number. One is 188.8.131.52 at rubyforge.org, the other is 2.1.1 at
> > rubygems.org.
> Let's use 184.108.40.206 so that it's greater than the previous version in
Ok. If bump up upstream gem's version number, we should change debian/watch.
> There seems to be something broken with the git repo. The master branch
> diverges from the upstream branch, and pristine-tar fails to generate
> the orig.tar.gz file.
I'm very sorry, I forgot push tags "upstream/220.127.116.11". I commit it.
Youhei SASAKI <firstname.lastname@example.org>
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07