Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate
On 01/05/2012 01:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/01/12 at 17:22 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of
blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded
copies should also be dropped in favor of the standalone package.
FYI: that dependency is 1.8 only.
What do you mean?
When run with with Ruby 1.9.x, it uses BasicObject instead. Related links:
It amuses me that the first link above was four years ago yesterday.
Note that it took over two years to get that patch applied.
- Sam Ruby