Re: Plans for rails & wheezy (Was: RFS: ruby-activemodel)
ondrej@ries:~$ dak ls ruby-activesupport
ondrej@ries:~$
Is there ruby-activesupport?
BTW: I have uploaded rails-2.3.14.1 which does all the strange things with
transitional and dummy dependency packages, so there should be
ruby-activesupport
depending on ruby-activesupport-2.3 after it gets accepted into the archive.
O.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:13, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> On 29/08/11 at 09:57 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> The applies for rails-* as well. My workload is already something between
>> 150%-200% and I really don't need more packages uploaded by DD or DM
>> who lost interest in maintaining them in few weeks. (Please don't take this
>> personally this is really a generic observation from an old fart^H^H^H^H
>> Debian Developer. Happened to me with some packages as well.)
>
> Speaking about that, should ruby-activesupport be removed from Debian for
> the time being?
O.
--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Reply to: