Re: Plans for rails & wheezy (Was: RFS: ruby-activemodel)

[Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>]

Hi,

I don't think it's good idea to have a dozen of rails versions in wheezy. We still need 2.3 (redmine) and basically I am waiting for 3.1 to go gold to upload it to unstable skipping the 3.0.

Also since we need multiple versions in the archive the package name has to be versioned.

So please don't upload. Ruby is API mess even without multiple rails versions.

Ondřej Surý

On 27.8.2011, at 9:31, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:

> On 27/08/11 at 09:49 +0530, karim memon wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>> 
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-activemodel".
>> 
>> * Package name    : ruby-activemodel
>>   Version         : 3.0.10-1
>>   Upstream Author : David Heinemeier Hansson
>> * URL             : http://rubygems.org/gems/activemodel
>> * License         : MIT
>>   Section         : ruby
>> 
>> It builds those binary packages:
>> 
>> ruby-activemodel - toolkit for building modeling frameworks (part of Rails).
>> 
>> To access further information about this package, please visit the following
>> URL:
>> 
>>  http://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-activemodel
>> 
>> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>> 
>>  dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-activemodel/ruby-activemodel_3.0.10-1.dsc
>> 
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I haven't looked at the package, but I know that Ondřej Surý has been
> doing some work on rails-related packages, so maybe he would like to
> have a look (Added to Cc).
> 
> Also, I was wondering what should be our plans for Rails in wheezy (2.3
> vs 3.0). What do people think? (I'm clueless about rails)
> 
> Lucas