Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > What about 2), e.g. rake and rubygems? Do you think we could always > > default to the non-bundled version for them as well? > > It's a bit tricky. For example, rdoc 1 (shipped in Ruby 1.8) is very > different from rdoc 2 & 3 (shipped in 1.9). Also, while it's easy to > override libraries using the vendor_dir precedence, it's not as simple > to override executables: basically, we would need to drop the > executables from the interpreter, and depend on the non-bundled version. > For rubygems, it's very non-trivial. > > Maybe that's something that should be raised on ruby-core@ to see what > they think? Do you want to prepare a mail? Yes, I've just included it on my TODO. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@softwarelivre.org> http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature