[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-bunny



(Please Cc -ruby@)

On 04/05/11 at 11:22 -0400, Varad Deshmukh wrote:
> Hi,
> I have replied to your corrections at the corresponding points.
> Should I also send another RFS with corrections? For example, the
> URL is wrong there also.

No, not needed.

> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>wrote:
> 
> > On 04/05/11 at 05:12 -0400, Varad Deshmukh wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-bunny".
> > >
> > > * Package name    : ruby-bunny
> > >   Version         : 0.6.0-1
> > >   Upstream Author : Chris Duncan <celldee@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >   URL             : https://github.com/celldee/bunny
> > > * License         : MIT
> > >   Section         : ruby
> > >
> > > It builds these binary packages:
> > > ruby-bunny - A synchronous Ruby AMQP client.
> > >
> > > The upload would fix these bugs: 624614
> > >
> > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: Wanting to be a part of
> > Debian.
> >
> > Can you confirm that your motivation for packaging this is that you want
> > this software to be part of Debian, and not yourself to be part of
> > Debian?
> >
> 
> My motivation is that 'I' want to a part of Debian maintenance.
> 
> 
> > If your motivation is to contribute to Debian, I would love to sponsor
> > one of the packages that need migration from ruby-pkg-tools to gem2deb
> > (see http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/details.html)
> > :-)
> >
> > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> > >
> > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-bunny
> > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> > > main contrib non-free
> > >
> > > - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-bunny/ruby-bunny_0.6.0-1.dsc
> >
> >
> I have corrected the changes you have mentioned except the last one -
> changing the FIXME's.
> Will do that soon.

OK, waiting for that, before doing another review.

L.


Reply to: