Hello Esteban, On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:30:13PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote: > Paul, did you talk to upstream to try to sort the issues out? I see that > at least the data/ directory issue is still there in the next, 1.1.2 version. I did not, but I am using an improved work-around via a rules-hook for now so that we do not have to change the tarball. But indeed, it might be worth pointing out this trival change to the devs to save us the trouble and make them more compliant. ;) > Also, I downloaded the modified orig tarball, and tried to build the > package again, but I end up with *.so files in libruby1.8 (Architecture: > all!). How can that be possible? I'm not changing anything in the source > package. Paul, do you have to do anything unusual to build the package? Not at all. Well except for the fact that libjson-ruby1.8 should be Architecture: any and not all. :) A fixed package will be on its way to a Debian archive server near you soon! Regards, Paul -- PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: paulvt@debian.org University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: paul@luon.net >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature