Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:35:27 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 873bj92cmo.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- In-reply-to: <1138410838.8246.8.camel@arrakis.localnet>
- References: <20060119233855.GC12818@localdomain> <20060120001551.GZ18803@alcor.net> <87psmnik6m.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060120050930.GG18803@alcor.net> <87k6cvh0a7.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060120172252.GP18803@alcor.net> <87d5ilvrms.fsf@becket.becket.net> <1138288663.12468.29.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr> <20060127010401.GA6849@localdomain> <1138351367.16359.22.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr> <20060127114636.GA10536@country.grep.be> <1138410838.8246.8.camel@arrakis.localnet>
Hi,
> > Sure, it'd be nice;
> > but then tomorrow someone else will come along who will claim that
> > Python is sucky and that Ruby is Teh Thing, and we can start this all
> > over from the start again.
>
> I hear this argument against python all the time, and frankly, if people
> were listening to such arguments, we'd all be programming COBOL on VMS.
As long as it's safe to work with a world-writable current directory
/tmp, I wouldn't mind either way.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2006/01/msg00010.html
I think the conclusion about LD_PATH was
python includes the 'current directory of the executed binary'
ruby includes the 'current directory', thus unsafe.
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
Reply to: