Re: should we propose a new section for ruby?

To: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Cc: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should we propose a new section for ruby?
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:21:14 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 1093972874.6201.1.camel@Cilantro>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87fz6345ga.wl@ukai.org>
References: <E1C24Jl-00013C-00@localhost> <[🔎] 87fz6345ga.wl@ukai.org>

On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 01:50 +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> I've noticed Bug#269180 requesting pike section.
> 
> We have more ruby packages than pike and ruby packages seems to be
> comparable to gnome and kde, so should we propose a new section
> for ruby?

Is it really needed? I think we have been dealing without it pretty
well. Is it only because of the pike request? If so, I don't really find
real excuses.

Regards,

-- 
David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> | http://www.damog.net/
 GPG 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F  B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD

Reply to:

References:
- should we propose a new section for ruby?
  - From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>

Prev by Date: should we propose a new section for ruby?
Next by Date: Re: should we propose a new section for ruby?
Previous by thread: should we propose a new section for ruby?
Next by thread: Re: should we propose a new section for ruby?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread