Re: Bug#1072650: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64
Hi Dirk
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 12:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> wrote:
> It is a (very) big package, but it has not grown much lately. Not being able
> to build may lead to auto-removal which is bad, excluding an architecture is
> also not good. Not clear what the least bad move is here...
I think the thing to do here is file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
request removal of the quantlib-python binary package on riscv64.
There's no need for a new upload of quantlib-swig with the
architectures restricted.
This way, users of testing get the new version right away, and should
the riscv64 build succeed later, it will automatically become
available there too.
Regards
Graham
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#1072650: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#1072650: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#1072650: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64
- From: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
- Re: Bug#1072650: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64
- From: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
- Re: Bug#1072650: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>