Hi Dirk, On 20-06-2024 2:17 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
It is a (very) big package, but it has not grown much lately. Not being able to build may lead to auto-removal which is bad, excluding an architecture is also not good. Not clear what the least bad move is here...
You might be aware, but pinging the bug resets the removal timer (if not done mere hours before the actual removal). So if you intent to keep the architecture supported and you and/or the riscv64 porters are working on it, feel free to keep pinging the bug to prevent removal. If nobody finds a solution keeping riscv64, removing the architecture is a good solution.
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature