Re: (Debian) LibreOffice and riscv64 and tests
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:27 PM René Engelhard <rene@rene-engelhard.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> when the riscv64 patches were added to libreoffice[1] I asked back then whether the tests pass.
>
> Then at least the most important test (whether the UNO internal communication works) was fixed.
> What still failed were a gazillion of patches, including all of the UI tests (which autopkgtest also tests). Those tests fail miserably.
>
> See [2]
>
> I don't have the mails anymore, but AFAICR it was promised that after that patch people would actually try to fix the "rest" of the tests. Which I have seen no signs of.
Okay. Thanks for reminding me again.
>
> For experimental - since it's experimental - that's OKish, but since riscv64 is supposed to be added to the archive and accordingt o a drfat i saw the release team even ponders to release with it this is not acceptable for a stable release and thus not for testing and thus not for unstable.
>
> Thus in the sid upload which happened on Saturday (and was accepted yesterday) - 4:7.5.4-2 - I made the testsuite fatal on riscv64 which then makes the "build" fail.
>
>
> Please make the tests pass :)
Here sakura286 has more authority than me. But there is no doubt that
we will try to make it.
In view of the importance of LO in office software, I will/can try to
maintain a disabled fail-test LO package out of the official Debian
archives until the upstream test passes.
BR,
Bo
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene
>
> [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=bc9487f745befde6534fd46058e119256952323d
> from
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/137445
>
> [2] experimental buildlog (failures ignored): https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=riscv64&ver=4%3A7.5.4%7Erc2-1&stamp=1685701135&raw=0
Reply to: