Re: Bug#1016482: jamulus: please add support for riscv64
(Removing you from Cc because you use Googlemail, which rejects
messages from @debian.org addresses nowadays; you should get the
eMail from the mailing list, I hope. Please consider switching to
an actual eMail provider instead.)
Bo YU dixit:
> Ok, thanks for let me know that. This is also what I worry about.
> Maybe some packages can be built on riscv64 arch, but they may not work
> as our imagination.
As someone who revived Debian/m68k some years ago (just so I can,
with my upstream hat on, brag that mksh works on all Debian and
Debian-Ports architectures), I have a look (via the buildd page)
at all architectures, including Ports, when possible anyway, for
all packages I maintain. So I understand the desire ☻
Here, however, the comment above the Architecture line was a
deliberate restriction.
And yes, sometimes the packages do not work but are still necessary
in order to fulfill Build-Depends and they are sufficient, even…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
When he found out that the m68k port was in a pretty bad shape, he did
not, like many before him, shrug and move on; instead, he took it upon
himself to start compiling things, just so he could compile his shell.
How's that for dedication. -- Wouter, about my Debian/m68k revival
Reply to: