[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1117730: marked as done (transition: wireshark)



Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2025 22:42:25 +0100
with message-id <aSy6QXhMpTcU25Fl@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1117730: transition: wireshark
has caused the Debian Bug report #1117730,
regarding transition: wireshark
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1117730: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1117730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I'd like to update wireshark in unstable. The only reverse dependency
to be rebuilt is libvirt [1].

I've performed the rebuild of reverse dependencies with Salsa's help [1].

Thank you,
Balint

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wireshark.html
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wireshark/-/pipelines/953817

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-10-19 17:44:22 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2025.
> okt. 13., H, 15:14):
> >
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 2025-10-10 12:50:25 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > Dear Release Team,
> > >
> > > I'd like to update wireshark in unstable. The only reverse dependency
> > > to be rebuilt is libvirt [1].
> > >
> > > I've performed the rebuild of reverse dependencies with Salsa's help [1].
> >
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Apparently Salsa's reverse dependency rebuilds may give false positive
> results on the top level.
> I've opened https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/519
> to track that.

The package migrated and the old binaries got removed from testing.
Closing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: