Bug#1120064: marked as done (transition: octomap)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2025 22:39:10 +0100
with message-id <aSy5fikpxwmKXtK0@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1120064: transition: octomap
has caused the Debian Bug report #1120064,
regarding transition: octomap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1120064: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: octomap@packages.debian.org, jlblanco@ual.es
Control: affects -1 + src:octomap
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I want to transition octomap from 1.9.7 to 1.10.0.
The new version has new ABI with new SONAME (liboctomap.so.1.10, liboctomath.so.1.10, liboctovis.so.1.10).
Builds for the new version in experimental is green for all architectures.
There are only 3 other packages depending on octomap:
Level 2:
- fcl
- mrpt
Level 3:
- dart
I chroot built them against the new octomap version with these results:
- fcl: builds OK.
- mrpt: builds OK.
- dart: 17 / 71 unit tests failed, but I'm almost totally sure that's not because of octomap...
Ben file:
title = "octomap";
is_affected = .depends ~ "liboctomap1" | .depends ~ "liboctomath1" | .depends ~ "liboctovis1";
is_good = .depends ~ "liboctomap1.10" | .depends ~ "liboctomath1.10" | .depends ~ "liboctovis1.10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "liboctomap1" | .depends ~ "liboctomath1" | .depends ~ "liboctovis1";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-11-07 08:48:00 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 04/11/2025 19:34, Jose Luis Blanco-Claraco wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: octomap@packages.debian.org, jlblanco@ual.es
> > Control: affects -1 + src:octomap
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > I want to transition octomap from 1.9.7 to 1.10.0.
> > The new version has new ABI with new SONAME (liboctomap.so.1.10, liboctomath.so.1.10, liboctovis.so.1.10).
> >
> > Builds for the new version in experimental is green for all architectures.
> >
> > There are only 3 other packages depending on octomap:
> > Level 2:
> > - fcl
> > - mrpt
> > Level 3:
> > - dart
> >
> > I chroot built them against the new octomap version with these results:
> > - fcl: builds OK.
> > - mrpt: builds OK.
> > - dart: 17 / 71 unit tests failed, but I'm almost totally sure that's not because of octomap...
>
> Go ahead.
The package migrated and the old binaries got removed from testing.
Closing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: