[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1108353: marked as done (bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.39-1~deb12u1)

Your message dated Sat, 06 Sep 2025 12:14:50 +0100
with message-id <ee4c0876608d99eb3f8b333b556fbd92e7a652eb.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing p-u requests for fixes included in 12.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108353,
regarding bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.39-1~deb12u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1108353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 + src:systemd
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear Release Team,

We would like to upload the latest stable point release of systemd 252
to bookworm-p-u. Stable release branches are maintained upstream with
the intention of providing bug fixes only and no compatibility
breakages, and with automated non-trivial CI jobs that also cover
Debian and Ubuntu. I have already uploaded to p-u.

There are no packaging changes. Debdiff attached.
The list of commits included can be seen at:

https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/compare/v252.38...v252.39

Attachment: debdiff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Version: 12.12

Hi,

Each of the updates referenced by these requests was included in
today's 12.12 point release for bookworm.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: