Bug#1111010: release.debian.org: phase out armel for forky
On 2025-08-22 13:34:17 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > On Aug 22, 2025, at 1:26 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2025-08-13 17:40:26 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> On 13-08-2025 16:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >>> Now that forky is open, would it be possible to start removing armel
> >>> from the lists of architectures that "matter"?
> >>
> >>
> >> We're intending to remove armel from testing soon. I seem to recall there
> >> was a reason why we might want to keep it longer during the cycle, but I
> >> can't recollect the reason and I can't seem to find it in my inbox (might
> >> have been on IRC or IRL. If nobody can reproduce the reason, we'll probably
> >> act within a couple of days/weeks. It already came up on IRC this week.
> >
> > I intend to merge
> > https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/tree/armel-removal by
> > the end of August and will then ask FTP to remove armel from forky.
>
> Could we add loong64 while we’re at it?
No. loong64 doesn't even exist in unstable yet. That needs to be taken
care of first.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: