Bug#1111010: release.debian.org: phase out armel for forky
Hello,
> On Aug 22, 2025, at 1:26 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-08-13 17:40:26 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 13-08-2025 16:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> Now that forky is open, would it be possible to start removing armel
>>> from the lists of architectures that "matter"?
>>
>>
>> We're intending to remove armel from testing soon. I seem to recall there
>> was a reason why we might want to keep it longer during the cycle, but I
>> can't recollect the reason and I can't seem to find it in my inbox (might
>> have been on IRC or IRL. If nobody can reproduce the reason, we'll probably
>> act within a couple of days/weeks. It already came up on IRC this week.
>
> I intend to merge
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/tree/armel-removal by
> the end of August and will then ask FTP to remove armel from forky.
Could we add loong64 while we’re at it?
Adrian
Reply to: