Bug#1102619: transition: libquotient

To: Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@debian.org>, 1102619@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1102619: transition: libquotient
From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:57:25 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] CAM8zJQvvb2FNuKOOQ8sO1zrRK9ZXuxnpzZmTTPkGM_WROrjwOw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>, 1102619@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <174435307561.197779.9757184043065867362.reportbug@Grummly>
References: <174435307561.197779.9757184043065867362.reportbug@Grummly> <174435307561.197779.9757184043065867362.reportbug@Grummly>

Control: tags -1 confirmed

Hi Aurélien

This is already underway.  The auto-libquotient looks fine, and I
don't see any collisions with other transitions.

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 06:33, Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@debian.org> wrote:
> I’ve uploaded it to experimental and it only has 2 rdeps:
> - neochat, rebuilds fine with the new lib,
> - quaternion, needs a new upstream release, that I also already uploaded
>   to experimental.

Please note that neochat FTBFS on armhf, and it FTBFS when it was
uploaded to experimental too.

There is also itinerary, and I have scheduled the binNMUs for it.

Regards
Graham

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#969633: marked as done (transition: json-simple)
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#1102619: transition: libquotient
Previous by thread: Bug#969633: marked as done (transition: json-simple)
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#1102619: transition: libquotient
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread