[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969633: marked as done (transition: json-simple)



Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:47:00 +0000
with message-id <CAM8zJQvoDkQ5VxNKkB+bYx8rCp8cJ_wKVQaf4cSHCN6ZBFZ1hQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#969633: transition: json-simple
has caused the Debian Bug report #969633,
regarding transition: json-simple
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
969633: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969633
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

I'd like to transition json-simple 3.1.1 surrently sitting into experimental.
The name of the library doens't change, but reverse dependencies need a
binnmu.

Here is the status for each of these build-rdeps:

biojava4-live		build OK
derby			build OK
h2database		build OK
i2p			build OK
jts			build OK
mapsforge		build OK
mobile-atlas-creator	build OK
mockito			build OK
netbeans		build KO - not in testing
orthanc-imagej		build OK
plm			build OK
spatial4j		build OK
spatial4j-0.4		build OK
syndie			build OK
tika			build KO - not in testing

Since there is no library name change, I'm not sure what to put into the
ben file. Here is an attempt:

Ben file:

title = "json-simple";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libjson-simple-java/ | .build-depends ~ /libjson-simple-java/;
is_good = .depends ~ /lbjson-simple-java/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /lbjson-simple-java/;

Thanks in advance for considering.

_g.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEoJObzArDE05WtIyR7+hsbH/+z4MFAl9UsaAACgkQ7+hsbH/+
z4ONUwf/W8FDPmIaBatEdvExBoeCh5IIudZmWVVvaKScAbr6upt10y8wU876kpfI
B31Cl1XtFvlaiDqVNvuSuzjJ2+nFaHaFZncxG5fI9xl9pWZgkLSFXkOLwEG7f2TK
3WIT3DQqvQATXJqOelVqqKEb4Jo3eenA0NAdrCkTXDHmEJxzwPFVKFpLwr4UsLOy
w87pX3HwJD/q2OYiPMY1WW71dT29Gd9CP22SIXsDQM6wHqeJN5TyzCozcmZH+uAZ
nF2jL8gq372mg0WvnFRrvbrUTkC2p/yf1CWXtuG/p8W/ORoUNfv1DUtlhAQqC+o7
sXiftUHiXfdS6NKSg31TyRNHauaFPw==
=s8ZV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
It doesn't look like this is happening, closing.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: