[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1109000: unblock: ruby-minitest/5.25.4-3



Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-minitest
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-minitest@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal

Please unblock package ruby-minitest

[ Reason ]
This update fixes #1093724.

[ Impact ]
It will allow users to cross build ruby extensions in trixie.

[ Tests ]
As one can see in #1093724, this patch was already tested in Ubuntu and
I confirmed that it works as expected.

[ Risks ]
The fix for this is one-liner (add Multi-Arch: foreign), so no
side-effect is expected.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

unblock ruby-minitest/5.25.4-3
diff -Nru ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/changelog ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/changelog
--- ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/changelog	2025-02-10 15:01:19.000000000 -0300
+++ ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/changelog	2025-07-08 10:47:50.000000000 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby-minitest (5.25.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Team upload.
+  * d/control: mark it as Multi-Arch: foreign (Closes: #1093724)
+
+ -- Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@debian.org>  Tue, 08 Jul 2025 10:47:50 -0300
+
 ruby-minitest (5.25.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * debian/rules: set LC_ALL to C.UTF-8
diff -Nru ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/control ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/control
--- ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/control	2025-02-10 15:01:19.000000000 -0300
+++ ruby-minitest-5.25.4/debian/control	2025-02-14 11:52:19.000000000 -0300
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
          ${ruby:Depends},
          ${shlibs:Depends}
 Suggests: ruby-test-unit
+Multi-Arch: foreign
 Description: Ruby test tools supporting TDD, BDD, mocking, and benchmarking
  minitest provides a complete suite of testing facilities supporting
  TDD, BDD, mocking, and benchmarking.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: