Your message dated Mon, 7 Jul 2025 11:42:25 +0200 with message-id <43053396-ac1f-4f1f-bec8-df7256afd66c@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1107305: unblock: mariadb/1:11.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1107305, regarding unblock: mariadb/1:11.8.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1107305: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107305 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: mariadb/1:11.8.2-1
- From: Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 12:50:47 +0300
- Message-id: <174911704735.676289.16280545935606114124.reportbug@XPS-13-9370>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package latest version of MariaDB 11.8 LTS. I am pre-emptively filing this so release team has visibility that the current MariaDB 11.8.1 version in Trixie will soon be superseded by version 11.8.2, which is the GA release of the 11.8 series. The MariaDB 11.8 series is long-term supported and hence I am targeting to have it in Trixie. The upstream release should be available within a week and have enough time to make it into Trixie via unstable, instead of going into as a stable update post release. unblock mariadb/1:11.8.2-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>, 1107305-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1107305: unblock: mariadb/1:11.8.2-1
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 11:42:25 +0200
- Message-id: <43053396-ac1f-4f1f-bec8-df7256afd66c@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <CAOU6tADEN+HpkRc4Jkxc7d6isCjO2p2pFgRTOEb7J7+jiSdOBQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <1750940387.089609.22121.nullmailer@XPS-13-9370> <b3026d96-4041-4c27-bdc5-286adb0671d6@creamarketing.com> <174911704735.676289.16280545935606114124.reportbug@XPS-13-9370> <CAOU6tADEN+HpkRc4Jkxc7d6isCjO2p2pFgRTOEb7J7+jiSdOBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Otto, On 6/30/25 08:25, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:It would likely serve Debian's users best if this was unblocked now.And hence I unblocked it.Can you do yourself and us a service and refrain from telling us each time why you don't need to follow the procedures that we came up with? You don't need to agree with the procedures, but we're delegated to handle the release process and as such we define it. It doesn't help anybody to try and bend the rules every time you interact with us.PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---