[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1100698: marked as done (transition: dovecot)

Your message dated Sun, 18 May 2025 08:16:22 +0200
with message-id <c42984ab-93d2-4ffa-b36f-1083988b42ab@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1100698: Bug#1104411: gsasl: autopkgtests fail with dovecot 2.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100698,
regarding transition: dovecot
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1100698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: dovecot@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dovecot

Since we're in a transition freeze, I'd like to request an exception to
allow src:dovecot 2.4 to enter trixie.  src:dovecot builds dovecot-dev,
which has two reverse build-deps, so requires a small transition.

The two potentially controversial issues with this transition are:

1. Reverse build-dep dovecot-antispam does not support version 2.4.  Its git
repository has seen no upstream activity since 2017 and the package has seen
no maintainer activity since 2018, so my suggestion is that we remove this
package from trixie altogether.

2. Dovecot 2.4 does not build on 32-bit architectures.  My intent was to
drop i386 anyway, but I did put out a call for help on debian-arm@lists.d.o
in case anybody wants to fix the issues as they impact 32-bit arm*
architectures.  Receiving no responses thus far, I'm inclined to drop
support for these architectures from the package.

Additionally, upstream is likely to publish a bugfix release (2.4.1) in the
near future.  Given the nature of this release, getting into trixie would
also be ideal.  I'd consider that a second transition for this package, as
we're currently working with 2.4.0, but I do want to mention it.

Thanks
noah

Ben file:

title = "dovecot";
is_affected = .depends ~ "dovecot-dev" | .depends ~ "dovecot-dev";
is_good = .depends ~ "dovecot-dev";
is_bad = .depends ~ "dovecot-dev";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi

On 14-05-2025 07:43, Paul Gevers wrote:

On 13-05-2025 02:46, Noah Meyerhans wrote:

This will require a binNMU of dovecot-fts-xapian on i386.  Other
architectures will not need to be rebuilt.



Scheduled and built.



And dovecot / dovecot-fts-xapian migrated.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: