Hi Noah,On Thu, 08 May 2025 10:10:06 +0200 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:
The testing migration seems a bit unclear to me, can you take a look if this will actually migrate? It is scheduled for autoremoval right now. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gsasl https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libgssglue I think you need a dependence on 'dovecot (>= 2.4~)' in gsasl/libgssglue, and a 'Breaks: gsasl (<< 2.2.2-1.1~), libgsasl (<< 0.9-1.1~)' in dovecot.
Without having spend a lot of time checking, this appears to be correct to me. To get more confidence, is the failure of the autopkgtest only a *test* regression, or is this also impacting regular use cases for users? In the latter case, the Breaks and versioned Depends are appropriate. In the former case I can get the tests to be scheduled to use both packages from unstable. (And I wonder the same about the other autopkgtest failures triggered by dovecot).
For avoidance of doubt, if we think these are only test failures and not user facing failures, I rather avoid further upload before things migrate to testing.
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature