Hi On Thursday, 15 May 2025 12:30:19 Central European Summer Time Paul Gevers wrote: > Please use the bts next time for such requests. On the mail list it's > easy to have it slip through. ok, will do. > > There's a bug in rakudo where pre-compilation is not reproducible. This > > leads to the production of conflicting files when creating Raku module > > packages containing pre-compiled files. > > You mean in the multiarch case, right? Yes, the pre-compiled files were in the multi-arch (arch: any) package. New packages ship only source files so they are now arch:all > > With dh-raku 0.19 (currently in unstable), pre-compilation is skipped. > Alhought dh-raku is not on our toolchain list [1], this change seems to > go against the spirit of it. While frozen, please coordinate the upload > of such a change next time ahead of uploading. ok, I'll keep that in mind. > There seems to be a spurious file in version 0.19: > diff -Nru > dh-raku-0.18/.vscode/perl-lang/home/domi/private/debian-dev/raku-stuff/dh-ra > ku/raku.pm > dh-raku-0.19/.vscode/perl-lang/home/domi/private/debian-dev/raku-stuff/dh-r > aku/raku.pm --- Indeed. Files in .vscode directory are added by language servers. They should not be shipped in package. I'll remove them. However, this extra file is harmless and very small. Should I ship a new version of dh-raku in Trixie ? > I'll add an age hint. Thanks All the best
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.