Hi Dod,Please use the bts next time for such requests. On the mail list it's easy to have it slip through.
On 12-05-2025 19:17, Dominique Dumont wrote:
There's a bug in rakudo where pre-compilation is not reproducible. This leads to the production of conflicting files when creating Raku module packages containing pre-compiled files.
You mean in the multiarch case, right?
With dh-raku 0.19 (currently in unstable), pre-compilation is skipped.
Alhought dh-raku is not on our toolchain list [1], this change seems to go against the spirit of it. While frozen, please coordinate the upload of such a change next time ahead of uploading.
All raku-* modules in unstable have a build-dep on dh-raku >= 0.19, so they no longer contains pre-compiled files, so they are no longer conflicting. Santiago (cc'ed) handle recompilation tests for packages in testing and he is bothered by the state of raku-* packages in testing. So ease his test activities, would it be possible to reduce the migration delay of dh-raku and raku-* packages ? (they are 7 days left).
There seems to be a spurious file in version 0.19:diff -Nru dh-raku-0.18/.vscode/perl-lang/home/domi/private/debian-dev/raku-stuff/dh-raku/raku.pm dh-raku-0.19/.vscode/perl-lang/home/domi/private/debian-dev/raku-stuff/dh-raku/raku.pm --- dh-raku-0.18/.vscode/perl-lang/home/domi/private/debian-dev/raku-stuff/dh-raku/raku.pm 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ dh-raku-0.19/.vscode/perl-lang/home/domi/private/debian-dev/raku-stuff/dh-raku/raku.pm 2025-05-08 09:26:55.000000000 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"vars":[{"name":"insert_before","kind":12,"line":10},{"containerName":"strict::Debian::Debhelper","line":10,"kind":2,"name":"Dh_Lib"},{"name":"remove_command","kind":12,"line":11},{"name":"insert_after","kind":12,"line":14},{"name":"remove_command","kind":12,"line":15}],"version":5}
\ No newline at end of file
I'll add an age hint.
Paul
[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/essential-and-build-essential.txt
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature