[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1098256: marked as done (transition: avro-c)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:57:31 +0100
with message-id <Z9PhazoBKu_ICbXl@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1098256: transition: avro-c
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098256,
regarding transition: avro-c
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1098256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098256
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 src:avro-c

Dear release managers,

I am writing to request a transition slot for avro-c.
The new upstream release contains mainly bug fixes without changing any
API or ABI, yet upstream has bumped the SONAME, thus this transition.

The Ben file should be (the automatic one looks correct).

title = "avro-c";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libavro23" | .depends ~ "libavro24";
is_good = .depends ~ "libavro24";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libavro23";

I have run ratt on build-rdeps of avro-c (only pmacct and reflect-cpp),
everything looks good, i.e. binNMUs would suffice.

-- 
Thanks,
Shengqi Chen

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2025-02-18 14:18:33 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 18/02/2025 13:42, Shengqi Chen wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Control: affects -1 src:avro-c
> > 
> > Dear release managers,
> > 
> > I am writing to request a transition slot for avro-c.
> > The new upstream release contains mainly bug fixes without changing any
> > API or ABI, yet upstream has bumped the SONAME, thus this transition.
> > 
> > The Ben file should be (the automatic one looks correct).
> > 
> > title = "avro-c";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libavro23" | .depends ~ "libavro24";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libavro24";
> > is_bad = .depends ~ "libavro23";
> > 
> > I have run ratt on build-rdeps of avro-c (only pmacct and reflect-cpp),
> > everything looks good, i.e. binNMUs would suffice.
> 
> Go ahead.

The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: