Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:56:40 +0100 with message-id <Z9PhOHaO8kjCA0r_@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1095266: transition: dcmtk has caused the Debian Bug report #1095266, regarding transition: dcmtk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1095266: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095266 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: dcmtk
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:11:21 +0100
- Message-id: <173882588111.420253.7059879226441854839.reportbug@inspiron.malat.net>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: dcmtk@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dcmtk I am filling a bug report asking for the transition for dcmtk 3.6.9. DCMTK 3.6.9 builds fine on all release archs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dcmtk&suite=experimental Ben file: title = "dcmtk"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libdcmtk18" | .depends ~ "libdcmtk19"; is_good = .depends ~ "libdcmtk19"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libdcmtk18";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>, 1095266-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1095266: transition: dcmtk
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:56:40 +0100
- Message-id: <Z9PhOHaO8kjCA0r_@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <Z7eMgT1nhihZ3kB8@emlwks999.eu>
- References: <173882588111.420253.7059879226441854839.reportbug@inspiron.malat.net> <Z634y_Ds0GQkHNOE@emlwks999.eu> <173882588111.420253.7059879226441854839.reportbug@inspiron.malat.net> <Z7Cbn1eKmzS7T6Uc@emlwks999.eu> <173882588111.420253.7059879226441854839.reportbug@inspiron.malat.net> <Z7DT8O76ulPgsVnS@emlwks999.eu> <3724773c-7ce0-417e-b8ba-37bd18f9a6db@debian.org> <Z7Yo-S11ca5CvvYI@emlwks999.eu> <173882588111.420253.7059879226441854839.reportbug@inspiron.malat.net> <Z7eMgT1nhihZ3kB8@emlwks999.eu>
On 2025-02-20 21:11:45 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Emilio, > > Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-19: > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, on 2025-02-18: > > > On 15/02/2025 18:50, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > > > As far as I can tell, everything is good, and outstanding issues > > > > are now out of the way. > > > > > > Thanks for the rebuilds and analysis. Go ahead. > > > > You're welcome, I see Mathieu Malaterre went ahead. > > We've had a ping from the Security Team about outstanding issues > in the experimental upload, so uploaded 3.6.9-4 yesterday[1]. > I've realised looking today at excuses that I probably would > have been well inspired to also coordinate here. Anyways, for > information… The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---