[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accidental upload of newer r-bioc-biocstyle to unstable ahead of BioConductor 3.20 transition



Dear Release Team,

While preparing uploads of the BioConductor 3.20 r-bioc-* packages to the experimental distribution, I accidentally uploaded a newer version of r-bioc-biocstyle (2.34.0+dfsg-1) to unstable.

Shall I fix this by rolling back the change with an upload of a r-bioc-biocstyle source package version "2.34.0+really2.32.1+dfsg-1" to unstable (and corresponding "2.34.0+really2.34.0+dfsg-1" version to experimental)?

Or shall I wait for the bioc-3.20 transition's [0] blockers [1][2] to be fixed and permission for the new r-bioc-* packages to be uploaded to unstable?

Sorry about the mess I made!

Thanks,

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/1088701
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1086904 RM: r-bioc-alabaster.base, r-bioc-alabaster.matrix [s390x]
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/1088299 ITP: r-bioc-assorthead -- Assorted Header-Only C++ Libraries (in NEW)

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: