Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:10:55 +0100 with message-id <bcbb81f8-7c15-341f-3db8-5c7e98c9f88b@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1033271: [pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033271, regarding [pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1033271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033271 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: [pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104
- From: Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 22:38:36 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 167900271614.1393971.9930911689890693568.reportbug@Grummly>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org> Dear Release Team, the KDE project recently released version 5.104 of the KDE Frameworks, the set of libraries used to build the Plasma desktop and KDE Gear applications. I’d like to advocate for the inclusion of KDE Frameworks 5.104 in bookworm, which contains a good bunch of bugfixes listed at [1] and [2] including fixes for several crashers. The 5.x branch of KDE Frameworks is now in maintenance mode since upstream switched to developing the Qt6-based 6.x versions, and I think the fixes in 5.104 can qualify as targetted fixes. Moreover, KDE Frameworks is a set of 83 tightly coupled packages and we have automated the packaging of new releases a lot, so I think from an operational perspective it will be less risky to update the whole set than backporting every patch to individual packages. Thus I’m looking for a pre-approval to upload all 83 to unstable in order to get them accepted into bookworm. I will file the 83 unblock requests if I get your approval, but I need the guarantee that all of the 83 packages will be unblocked if you accept to go down that route so the whole set of packages land consistently into bookworm. You’ll find the following attachment for review : frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo.diff.gz => the upstream diff without po files frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo_nodesktop_noCMakeLists.diff.gz => the upstream diff additionally trimmed of desktop files and CMakeLists.txt build files frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_CMakeLists.diff.gz => all CMakeLists.txt changes alone frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_changelog.diff.gz => the debian changelog diffs frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_nochangelog.diff.gz => the debian packaging diff without the changelogs The packages have been uploaded to experimental as a first step. [1] https://kde.org/announcements/frameworks/5/5.104.0/ [2] https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=NEEDSINFO&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=cf_versionfixedin&list_id=2307201&o1=equals&query_format=advanced&v1=5.104 Thanks ! -- AurélienAttachment: frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo.diff.gz
Description: application/gzipAttachment: frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo_nodesktop_noCMakeLists.diff.gz
Description: application/gzipAttachment: frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_CMakeLists.diff.gz
Description: application/gzipAttachment: frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_changelog.diff.gz
Description: application/gzipAttachment: frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_nochangelog.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@debian.org>, 1033271-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1033271: [pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:10:55 +0100
- Message-id: <bcbb81f8-7c15-341f-3db8-5c7e98c9f88b@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 167900271614.1393971.9930911689890693568.reportbug@Grummly>
- References: <[🔎] 167900271614.1393971.9930911689890693568.reportbug@Grummly>
Hi Aurélien, On 16-03-2023 22:38, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:Thus I’m looking for a pre-approval to upload all 83 to unstable in order to get them accepted into bookworm. I will file the 83 unblock requests if I get your approval, but I need the guarantee that all of the 83 packages will be unblocked if you accept to go down that route so the whole set of packages land consistently into bookworm.That's not reviewable from our side and handling 83 unblocks is painful too. Sorry, our workflow doesn't support your request so let's not do this.PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---