[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1033271: marked as done ([pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:10:55 +0100
with message-id <bcbb81f8-7c15-341f-3db8-5c7e98c9f88b@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033271: [pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033271,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: KDE frameworks 5.104
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1033271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>

Dear Release Team,

the KDE project recently released version 5.104 of the KDE Frameworks,
the set of libraries used to build the Plasma desktop and KDE Gear
applications.

I’d like to advocate for the inclusion of KDE Frameworks 5.104 in
bookworm, which contains a good bunch of bugfixes listed at [1] and [2]
including fixes for several crashers.

The 5.x branch of KDE Frameworks is now in maintenance mode since
upstream switched to developing the Qt6-based 6.x versions, and I think
the fixes in 5.104 can qualify as targetted fixes.

Moreover, KDE Frameworks is a set of 83 tightly coupled packages and we
have automated the packaging of new releases a lot, so I think from an
operational perspective it will be less risky to update the whole set
than backporting every patch to individual packages.

Thus I’m looking for a pre-approval to upload all 83 to unstable in
order to get them accepted into bookworm.
I will file the 83 unblock requests if I get your approval, but I need
the guarantee that all of the 83 packages will be unblocked if you
accept to go down that route so the whole set of packages land
consistently into bookworm.

You’ll find the following attachment for review :

frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo.diff.gz
=> the upstream diff without po files
frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo_nodesktop_noCMakeLists.diff.gz
=> the upstream diff additionally trimmed of desktop files and
   CMakeLists.txt build files
frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_CMakeLists.diff.gz
=> all CMakeLists.txt changes alone

frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_changelog.diff.gz
=> the debian changelog diffs
frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_nochangelog.diff.gz
=> the debian packaging diff without the changelogs


The packages have been uploaded to experimental as a first step.


[1] https://kde.org/announcements/frameworks/5/5.104.0/
[2] https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=NEEDSINFO&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=cf_versionfixedin&list_id=2307201&o1=equals&query_format=advanced&v1=5.104


Thanks !
--
Aurélien

Attachment: frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_nopo_nodesktop_noCMakeLists.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: frameworks_upstream_5.103.0..5.104.0_CMakeLists.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_changelog.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: frameworks_debian_5.103.0..5.104.0_nochangelog.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Aurélien,

On 16-03-2023 22:38, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:

Thus I’m looking for a pre-approval to upload all 83 to unstable in
order to get them accepted into bookworm.
I will file the 83 unblock requests if I get your approval, but I need
the guarantee that all of the 83 packages will be unblocked if you
accept to go down that route so the whole set of packages land
consistently into bookworm.
That's not reviewable from our side and handling 83 unblocks is painful too. Sorry, our workflow doesn't support your request so let's not do this. 

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: