Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:03:32 +0100 with message-id <bae44c01-e6dc-c3b6-a957-e6df4aa409d0@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1033227: unblock: live-tasks-non-free-firmware/12.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033227, regarding unblock: live-tasks-non-free-firmware/12.0.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1033227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: live-tasks-non-free-firmware/12.0.1
- From: Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:55:11 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 167931331173.578531.18139207983921647019.reportbug@defiant.bluemosh.com>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: live-tasks-non-free-firmware@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:live-tasks-non-free-firmware Please unblock package live-tasks-non-free-firmware This is provides meta-packages on live systems to install non-free firmware packages on those systems. Sorry for it being so late, it depended on the firmware section itself existing and being populated. The package only provides the metapackages, for convenience, I'm including the control file below: """ Source: live-tasks-non-free-firmware Maintainer: Live Systems Maintainers <debian-live@lists.debian.org> Uploaders: Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> Section: non-free-firmware/metapackages Priority: optional Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13) Standards-Version: 4.6.2 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-tasks-non-free-firmware Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-tasks-non-free-firmware.git Rules-Requires-Root: no Package: live-task-non-free-firmware-pc Architecture: all Recommends: amd64-microcode, bluez-firmware, firmware-amd-graphics, firmware-atheros, firmware-brcm80211, firmware-intel-sound, firmware-ipw2x00, firmware-iwlwifi, firmware-linux, firmware-linux-nonfree, firmware-realtek, firmware-sof-signed, intel-microcode Suggests: vrms Description: selection of oft-used non-free-firmware shipped on live systems Provides non-free-firmware packages for Debian live systems. . Its dependencies, along with this package itself, is safe to remove, provided that your device does not depend on them in order to function. Package: live-task-non-free-firmware-server Architecture: all Recommends: firmware-bnx2, firmware-bnx2x, firmware-cavium, firmware-myricom, firmware-netronome, firmware-netxen, firmware-qlogic Suggests: vrms Description: provides firmware for server network and storage devices Provides non-free firmware packages for Debian live systems. . This package installs firmware packages for server devices. . Its dependencies, along with this package itself, is safe to remove, provided that your device does not depend on them in order to function. """ unblock live-tasks-non-free-firmware/12.0.1 thanks, -Jonathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org>, 1033227-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1033227: unblock: live-tasks-non-free-firmware/12.0.1
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:03:32 +0100
- Message-id: <bae44c01-e6dc-c3b6-a957-e6df4aa409d0@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 167931331173.578531.18139207983921647019.reportbug@defiant.bluemosh.com>
- References: <[🔎] 167931331173.578531.18139207983921647019.reportbug@defiant.bluemosh.com>
Hi Jonathan, On 20-03-2023 12:55, Jonathan Carter wrote:Sorry for it being so late, it depended on the firmware section itself existing and being populated.Ugh, you're late indeed.The package only provides the metapackages, ...Ack. And for that reason we'll allow it in.By the way, you may want to improve the description. You're talking about dependencies, while the binaries don't have any. They only have recommends.PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---