[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bullseye-ignore for embedding different paths if built on merged-/usr systems?



On 10/11/2022 11.49, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,

On 10-11-2022 11:45, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
since bullseye mandates that buildd chroots are non-merged-/usr, can we tag bugs about binaries differing (by embedding different paths to "found binaries") when built on merged-/usr systems as bullseye-ignore?

I think it depends. What happens if people rebuild the package on their own system? If that's broken than the bug shouln't be *-ignore in my book.

The package will work fine on the merged-/usr system where it was built, but it might break if put on a different non-merged-/usr system.

Are you really talking about bullseye here, or did you mean bookworm? Because bullseye would be more Adam's territory.

bullseye (and buster). I don't think these bugs warrant a stable-pu upload on their own, but they are RC (and shouldn't be ignored) for bookworm.


Andreas


Reply to: