Hi Sebastian, Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2022-07-13 22:52:52) > On 2021-09-29 10:38:07 +0200, josch@mister-muffin.de wrote: > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine with the new Imagemagick version? > > > If not, have bugs been filed? > > > > I have rebuilt all 399 source packages that have at least one binary produced > > by src:imagemagick in their build dependency installation closure. Of those, 16 > > packages FTBFS with the imagemagick version form experimental but succeed with > > the version from unstable. Of those, only one package (src:wand) is in the list > > from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-imagemagick.html I filed > > this failure as #995290 and will investigate the other 15 instances as well. > > But since those source packages are not part of the transition, they should > > probably not block this bug. > > This transition completly dropped off my radar, sorry! > > What's the current status of the preparations? Have the bugs been filed? we had one build failure in src:wand which I fixed in imagemagick upload of 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1.2 to experimental. See also #995290 Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature