Bug#994540: transition: imagemagick

[Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>]

Hi

On 2021-09-29 10:38:07 +0200, josch@mister-muffin.de wrote:
> In-reply-to:
> From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:27:19 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > On 2021-09-17 12:51:37 +0000, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > > 
> > > Imagemagick changes some internal structures. Upstream bump so (safe), so ask
> > > for a rebuilt.
> > 
> > Do all reverse dependencies build fine with the new Imagemagick version?
> > If not, have bugs been filed?
> 
> I have rebuilt all 399 source packages that have at least one binary produced
> by src:imagemagick in their build dependency installation closure. Of those, 16
> packages FTBFS with the imagemagick version form experimental but succeed with
> the version from unstable. Of those, only one package (src:wand) is in the list
> from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-imagemagick.html I filed
> this failure as #995290 and will investigate the other 15 instances as well.
> But since those source packages are not part of the transition, they should
> probably not block this bug.

This transition completly dropped off my radar, sorry!

What's the current status of the preparations? Have the bugs been filed?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher