Bug#1019353: marked as done (transition: perl 5.36)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:41:07 +0200
with message-id <396fe273-1146-47bf-dfee-5193dee07e3e@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1019353: transition: perl 5.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019353,
regarding transition: perl 5.36
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1019353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Tags: moreinfo
X-Debbugs-Cc: perl@packages.debian.org
Control: block -1 with 1016761
We'd like to get Perl 5.36 in bookworm. Filing this to get it on the
radar properly, but I'd like to do a few more checks first. So tagging
'moreinfo' for now. I'll remove that when I'm done with the checks,
hopefully in a couple of weeks at the latest.
The package in experimental is in good shape. We've been continuously
rebuilding perl reverse dependencies (currently 4507 packages) since
June or so on http://perl.debian.net/ , and tracking regressions at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.36-transition;users=debian-perl@lists.debian.org
The only remaining regression in testing that I'm aware of is #1016761
which should be easy to fix by dropping the problematic test case that
uses HTTP::Tiny internals in a not forward compatible way.
I ran autopkgtest checks of 3847 packages that have Testsuite-Triggers:
perl or Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl locally in July and did not find
any regressions from sid. I intend to recheck this on ci.debian.net
soon now that we have support for external repositories there (thanks,
Paul et al.!) The recent egrep deprecation (#1019335) in sid may be a
blocker for this though.
I also intend to test rebuild the ~500 packages in sid that will need a
binNMU one more time to catch any non-perl-related new build failures.
I don't have a good way to spot non-amd64 architecture specific issues
or unrelated version skew between unstable and testing, so those can
still yield surprises for the transition.
title = "perl";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libperl5.34|perlapi-5.34" | .pre-depends ~ "libperl5.34|perlapi-5.34";
is_good = .depends ~ "libperl5.36|perlapi-5.36" | .pre-depends ~ "libperl5.36|perlapi-5.36";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libperl5.34|perlapi-5.34" | .pre-depends ~ "libperl5.34|perlapi-5.34";
Thanks for your work on the release,
--
Niko Tyni ntyni@debiar.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 18/10/2022 19:25, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:47:39PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
We'd like to get Perl 5.36 in bookworm. Filing this to get it on the
radar properly, but I'd like to do a few more checks first. So tagging
'moreinfo' for now. I'll remove that when I'm done with the checks,
hopefully in a couple of weeks at the latest.
That looks good. Please go ahead.
Thanks! perl_5.36.0-4 uploaded to unstable.
And it migrated last night. Thanks for the help to everyone involved!
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: