Re: Processed: unarchiving 970132

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 10:36 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:02:34PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > I realise this was only unarchived, rather than re-opened, but as
> > I'm
> > not sure why you'd do one without intending to do the other -
> > please do
> > not re-use the old bug for any further rustc uploads; those should
> > be
> > tracked in a new bug.
> > 
> > If I've misunderstood the intention then apologies.
> > 
> Hi Adam,
> 
> I was attempting to follow-up with Adrian concerning his last message
> about the armel build failure.  I downloaded the bug as mbox, then
> replied to Adrian and the bug but the reply to the bug was rejected
> because it was archived.  I tried to unarchive and subscribe then
> reply again, but I that didn't work either (it seems because I didn't
> allow sufficient time for the unarchive to process before re-sending
> the reply).

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation, and confirming that I needn't
have worried.

Regards,

Adam