Bug#998067: transition: libsepol and libsemanage

[Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>]

On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 22:29:41 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher 
<sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2021-10-29 13:44:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > libsepol and libsemanage have both bumped their soname from 1 to 2, the
> > packages already went through the NEW queue and are in experimental.
> >
> > The transition trackers are already created:
> >
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsepol.html
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsemanage.html
> >
> > Most of the packages are from the same upstream.
> >
> > For libsemanage, sssd and shadow will have to adjust their 
build-dependencies
>
> Have bugs been filed for that?
>

I just did that now, see #998633 and #998634

Note that I uploaded a new revision (3.1-2) of libsemanage in unstable 
to ease the dependency between the library package and the -common one 
and allow co-installation between libsemanage1 and libsemanage2.

Maybe we should wait until 3.1-2 has migrated to testing (and maybe 
reduce the migration time so we are not waiting 5 days?)