[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#998067: transition: libsepol and libsemanage



Control: tags -1 = confirmed

On 2021-11-05 11:19:04 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 22:29:41 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On 2021-10-29 13:44:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > libsepol and libsemanage have both bumped their soname from 1 to 2, the
> > > packages already went through the NEW queue and are in experimental.
> > >
> > > The transition trackers are already created:
> > >
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsepol.html
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsemanage.html
> > >
> > > Most of the packages are from the same upstream.
> > >
> > > For libsemanage, sssd and shadow will have to adjust their
> build-dependencies
> >
> > Have bugs been filed for that?
> >
> 
> I just did that now, see #998633 and #998634
> 
> Note that I uploaded a new revision (3.1-2) of libsemanage in unstable to
> ease the dependency between the library package and the -common one and
> allow co-installation between libsemanage1 and libsemanage2.
> 
> Maybe we should wait until 3.1-2 has migrated to testing (and maybe reduce
> the migration time so we are not waiting 5 days?)

-2 migrated, please go ahead.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: