Bug#993100: bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1

[Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>]

Am 03.12.2021 um 15:21 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 01:58:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > I'd like to make a stable upload for udisks2, fixing #992152:
> > "udisks2: please update Recommends on exfat-utils to exfatprogs for Linux kernel 5"
> >
> > This issue has already been fixed in unstable/testing and the relevant
> > changes for bullseye are an upstream cherry-pick and a packaging
> > cherry-pick.
> How compatible are exfat-utils/exfatprogs?  E.g. could this cause
> unexpected results (outside of udisks) for a user system that switched
> to exfatprogs as a result of this?

The command line tools are (mostly) compatible. I'm only aware of the
issue detailed at https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/882
i.e. exfat-utils provides a mkextfatfs tool, whereas exfatprogs doesn't

It is my understanding that exfatprogs is the vastly superior 
implementation and we should prefer it over the FUSE based one.

I've CCed Sven, as exfatprogs maintainer,  for his input.

Regards,
Michael

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature