Bug#993100: bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1
- To: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>, 993100@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#993100: bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:21:49 +0100
- Message-id: <Yaon/eePZ4SH29iQ@jcristau-z4>
- Reply-to: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, 993100@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <163006549948.69646.3690115117528511110.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx>
- References: <163006549948.69646.3690115117528511110.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx> <163006549948.69646.3690115117528511110.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx>
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 01:58:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd like to make a stable upload for udisks2, fixing #992152:
> "udisks2: please update Recommends on exfat-utils to exfatprogs for Linux kernel 5"
>
> This issue has already been fixed in unstable/testing and the relevant
> changes for bullseye are an upstream cherry-pick and a packaging
> cherry-pick.
>
How compatible are exfat-utils/exfatprogs? E.g. could this cause
unexpected results (outside of udisks) for a user system that switched
to exfatprogs as a result of this?
Thanks,
Julien
Reply to: