[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#993934: transition: libgweather



Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2021-09-19 15:45:41 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> 
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2021 at 10:53:24 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > libgweather has behaviour changes that required versioned Breaks on various
> > packages. Please see
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992870#12 for more
> > details.
> 
> Now that gnome-shell 40 is in testing, I think it might be time to do
> the libgweather transition.
> 
> I believe the necessary changes are:
> 
> * https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/libgweather/-/merge_requests/3
>   Adjust Breaks to make sure everything mentioned below gets in
> 
> * https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/evolution-data-server/-/merge_requests/4
>   Backport libgweather support from experimental, while avoiding starting
>   the e-d-s transition
> 
> * https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-panel/-/merge_requests/2
>   Force gnome-panel to be on the "new" side of the transition, so we can
>   have a versioned Breaks on older versions
> 
> * https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-applets/-/merge_requests/2
>   Force gnome-applets to be on the "new" side of the transition, so we can
>   have a versioned Breaks on older versions
> 
> * https://salsa.debian.org/wmaker-team/wmforecast/-/merge_requests/4
>   Update wmforecast to the version from experimental
>   (requires non-GNOME-team action or NMU)
> 
> * https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-calendar/-/merge_requests/1
>   Update gnome-calendar to the version from experimental
> 
> ... and a binNMU of gnome-settings-daemon, after the new libgweather is in
> unstable, would be nice but is not required.
> 
> GNOME team: any last-minute objections?
> 
> Release team: please let us know when we can go ahead.

This does not seem to require a lot of attentation from our side. Please
go ahead whenever you are ready.

Cheers

> 
> Thanks,
>     smcv
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: