Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2021 21:51:30 +0200 with message-id <c618b2e8-8a7f-6ed8-6f2f-885b41751f62@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#990956: uploading lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates has caused the Debian Bug report #990956, regarding uploading lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 990956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990956 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: uploading lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates
- From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 17:44:34 +0000
- Message-id: <YOsuArtpWZ8ymHs5@jelmer.uk>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hi release team, Can I upload a small fix for lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates to allow it to remain in testing? I just found out an old FTBFS bug is still affecting it in testing, and there's a much newer version in unstable. The bug in question is https://bugs.debian.org/988909 Thanks, Jelmer
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>, 990956-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#990956: uploading lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 21:51:30 +0200
- Message-id: <c618b2e8-8a7f-6ed8-6f2f-885b41751f62@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <1570204d-5c62-fb7e-e0dc-79a426d75063@debian.org>
- References: <YOsuArtpWZ8ymHs5@jelmer.uk> <dba7dfb2-432f-8717-49f4-10e36c4000f2@debian.org> <YOtKxqn1EFPwFRgi@jelmer.uk> <fed523f8-3491-589d-eefe-03aaaccc9bd2@debian.org> <YOsuArtpWZ8ymHs5@jelmer.uk> <YOt8q6AdKnFNTL03@blodeuwedd> <630f9f91-c56b-2fab-0421-ecae5d988478@debian.org> <YOsuArtpWZ8ymHs5@jelmer.uk> <YPX8ygqM4TcCXTDg@blodeuwedd> <4808a88f-58f4-255f-f515-36956d4dbeaa@debian.org> <YOsuArtpWZ8ymHs5@jelmer.uk> <YPdNFndwy2dlcAdy@blodeuwedd> <YOsuArtpWZ8ymHs5@jelmer.uk> <1570204d-5c62-fb7e-e0dc-79a426d75063@debian.org>
Hi Jelmer, On 22-07-2021 10:37, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 21-07-2021 00:24, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: >> Done, thanks. Hopefully this looks alright. > > The diff of the package in tpu doesn't look like the one I ACKed. We're getting too close to the release of bullseye. I'm removing lintian-brush. PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---