[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploading linux (5.10.46-1)



Hi

I would like to upload another linux version before the d-i RC3
release, ideally to at least 5.10.46-1. It would cover the usual round
of bugfixes with the stable version imports, which we want to follow
further as stategy in stable.

An ABI bump is included.

The packaging changes done cover bugfixes and additional hardware
support, or bugfixes for installation support for the installer.
Additionally covers a set of CVE fixes (CVE-2020-24586,
CVE-2020-24587, CVE-2020-24588, CVE-2020-26139, CVE-2020-26141,
CVE-2020-26145, CVE-2020-26147, CVE-2021-3564, CVE-2021-3573,
CVE-2021-3587, CVE-2021-3609, CVE-2021-28691, CVE-2021-33624,
CVE-2021-34693).

The packaging changes are for now:

   * [armhf] drivers/bluetooth: Enable BT_HCIUART as a module, with support
     for all features already enabled in the generic config. (Closes: #987361)
   * [armhf] enable i.MX6 MIPI-CSI video capture device. (Closes: #987365)
     - drivers/mux: Enable MUX_MMIO as a module.
     - drivers/media/platform: Enable VIDEO_MUX as a module.
     - drivers/staging/media/imx: Enable VIDEO_IMX_MEDIA and VIDEO_IMX_CSI as
   * [arm64] Update device tree for Kobol's helios64 from next
     modules.

Adding additional hardware support.
   
   * [rt] Refresh "net/Qdisc: use a seqlock instead seqcount"
   * Ignore some ABI changes that should not affect OOT modules
   * Bump ABI to 8
   * [rt] Refresh "tracing: Merge irqflags + preempt counter"
   * can: bcm: delay release of struct bcm_op after synchronize_rcu()
     (CVE-2021-3609)

Refreshes to the rt patchset due to the new stable series versions.
One CVE fix cherry-picked.

   * [arm64] Add pwm-rockchip to fb-modules udeb.
   * [arm64] Add fusb302, tcpm and typec to usb-modules udeb.
   * [armhf] Add gpio-mxc to kernel-image udeb. Thanks to Rick Thomas.
     (Closes: #982270)

For installer support in arm64, armhf area.

Regards,
Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: