[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#989513: marked as done (unblock: galera-4/26.4.8-1)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:01:18 +0200
with message-id <433d7b31-9bb2-b766-7906-ab840ead4fe5@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#989513: unblock: galera-4/26.4.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #989513,
regarding unblock: galera-4/26.4.8-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
989513: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989513
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package galera-4 to fix MariaDB upgrade as reported in #988089.

[ Reason ]
Users reported that running 'apt dist-upgrade' resulted in removal of
mariadb-server-10.3 instead of upgrade to mariadb-server-10.5. This
was due to incomplete relations defined in galera-4, which is a
dependency of mariadb-server-10.5 (while galera-3 is a dependency of
mariadb-server-10.3)

[ Impact ]
'apt dist-upgrade' fails to upgrade MariaDB

[ Tests ]
Extensive Salsa-CI with specific upgrade test introduced in
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/27a142792b5e02e66b8f1adf9a7b896c5722dd17
and visible at https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/pipelines/257428

[ Risks ]
Low, leaf package.

This also introduces the latest upstream version. It has already been
in Sid for a while without reported regressions, and in general Galera
packages have been very low on regressions.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing


[ changelog ]

galera-4 (26.4.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release 26.4.8
  * Remove patches applied upstream
  * Drop SConstruct patch for i386 as SCons is not used for builds anymore
  * Bugfix: Don't uninstall MariaDB on Galera 3 to 4 upgrade (Closes: #988089)
    This ensures the Buster installs of mariadb-server-10.3 (that depend on
    galera-3) correctly upgrade to Bullseye installs of mariadb-server-10.5
    (that depend on galera-4).



unblock galera-4/26.4.8-1

Attachment: debian-26.4.8-1.debdiff.stat.xz
Description: application/xz

Attachment: debian-26.4.8-1.debdiff.xz
Description: application/xz


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Otto,

On 10-06-2021 20:26, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>>> Please unblock package galera-4 to fix MariaDB upgrade as reported in 
#988089.
>>
>> I appreciate a fix for that bug, but did you really have to do that by
>> uploading a new upstream release too? How is the new upstream release
>> related to that bug?
> 
> Yes, the upstream package is a maintenance/fix release for Galera 4
> that does not introduce any new features, only fixes bugs. It is the
> kind of change that could go into Debian Bullseye as a stable update
> too, so I thought it would be better to do it now.

It would have been very helpful if you would have mentioned that in the
initial unblock mail.

>>> [ Risks ]
>>> Low, leaf package.
>>
>> Nope, the package is a key package.
> 
> Indeed, it seems to be listed at
> https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
> 
> However, only MariaDB depends on it and the package is very small and
> has traditionally had zero or almost zero bugs in Debian.

And this would have been helpful too.

> It has also been well tested.

It would also have been helpful if you had elaborated on that.

And as the diff includes lots of changes in tests and examples, it might
have been useful to also prepare a filtered debdiff excluding those, to
make the amount of changes less frightful.

Anyways, unblocked.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: