[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#965124: marked as done (transition: pcl)

Your message dated Sat, 1 Aug 2020 16:09:16 +0200
with message-id <20200801140916.GB1274412@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#965124: transition: pcl
has caused the Debian Bug report #965124,
regarding transition: pcl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
965124: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi Release team,

I would like to transition pcl to unstable. The Ben file is fine,
ros-perception-pcl compiles against the new version and I will upload a
fixed python-pcl version during the transition.

Cheers Jochen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-07-26 17:55:22 +0200, jspricke@debian.org wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> * Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> [2020-07-26 17:00]:
> > On 2020-07-19 01:33:17 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pcl.html
> > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > > 
> > > On 2020-07-16 16:10:32 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > >
> > > > Hi Release team,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to transition pcl to unstable. The Ben file is fine,
> > > > ros-perception-pcl compiles against the new version and I will upload a
> > > > fixed python-pcl version during the transition.
> > > 
> > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
> > 
> > pcl fails to migrate due to an autopkgtest regression. Could you take a
> > look at the test?
> 
> I had a look and the problem is that libpcl-conversions-dev and
> libpcl-ros-dev (in ros-perception-pcl) picked up the include path of pcl
> (which changed). But both where rebuild for the transition anyhow so the
> versions in unstable work.
> 
> I think the best solution would be to find_package() the include path
> instead of hard coding it but that needs some planning and testing due to
> how the current cmake macros work.
> 
> The other option would be to have a versioned dependency on libpcl-dev but
> the same problem could happen for other dependencies of
> libpcl-conversions-dev so I would prefer not to do that.
> 
> Could you maybe add a hint so pcl can transition and we gain some time to
> implement a proper solution?

Sorry for the delay. The autopkgtest regression was fixed and I've aged
the latest pcl upload:

pcl        | 1.11.0+dfsg-5        | testing         | source

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: